ÃÊ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ´ëÇлý Âü¿©ÀÚµéÀÌ Ä£±¸ ȤÀº ¿¬ÀÎÀÇ ÀÚ»ì À§±â¸¦ ¾î¶»°Ô ÀνÄÇÏ°í ´ëóÇÏ ¿´À¸¸ç, ±× °úÁ¤¿¡¼ ¾î¶°ÇÑ °ü°è º¯È¸¦ °æÇèÇÏ´ÂÁö¸¦ Ž»öÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±¸¼ºÁÖÀÇ ±Ù °ÅÀÌ·ÐÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© Ä£±¸ ¶Ç´Â ¿¬ÀÎÀÇ ÀÚ»ì À§±â¸¦ °æÇèÇÑ ´ëÇлý 14¸íÀ» ½ÉÃþ ¸é´ãÇϰí, ¸é´ã ÀڷḦ Áö¼ÓÀû ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼® °á°ú, °æÇèÀº Ãʱâ Á¤¼ ¹ÝÀÀ, °³ÀÔ ¹× µ¹º½ ½Ãµµ, Á¤¼Àû ¼ÒÁø°ú ÇѰè ÀνÄ, ´ëó ¹× °ü°è º¯ÈÀÇ ³× °³ÀÇ ¿µ¿ª¿¡ °ÉÄ£ °úÁ¤À¸·Î µµ ÃâµÇ¾ú´Ù. Ä£±¸¿Í ¿¬ÀÎ ¸ðµÎ Ãʱ⿡ °ÇÑ Ãæ°ÝÀ» °æÇèÇßÀ¸³ª, Ä£±¸ °ü°è¿¡¼´Â ÁËÃ¥°¨ÀÌ, ¿¬ÀÎ °ü°è¿¡¼´Â ºÎ´ã°¨ÀÌ µÎµå·¯Á³´Ù. ÀÌÈÄ µ¹º½ ½Ãµµ°¡ À̾îÁ³Áö¸¸ Á¤¼Àû ¼ÒÁøÀÌ ´© ÀûµÇ¾ú°í, ±× °á°ú Ä£±¸ °ü°è¿¡¼´Â °æ°è ¼³Á¤°ú °Å¸® µÎ±â°¡, ¿¬ÀÎ °ü°è¿¡¼´Â °ü°è ´Ü Àý°ú À̺° ÀÌÈÄÀÇ ÁËÃ¥°¨ÀÌ Æ¯Â¡ÀûÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¶Ç·¡ÀÇ ÀÚ»ì À§±â ´ëó °æ ÇèÀÌ °ü°è ¸Æ¶ô ¼Ó¿¡¼ Çü¼ºµÇ´Â °úÁ¤ÀÓÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¸ç, °ü°èÀû Ư¼ºÀÌ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Ý¿µ ÇÑ Áö¼Ó °¡´ÉÇÑ ÀÚ»ì ¿¹¹æ °³ÀÔÀÇ Çʿ伺À» ½Ã»çÇÑ´Ù.
This study explored how college students responded to a friend¡¯s or romantic partner¡¯s suicidal crisis and how their relationships changed over time. Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with 14 college students who had experienced a friend¡¯s or romantic partner¡¯s suicidal crisis, and the data were analyzed through constant comparative analysis. Findings identified four domains: initial emotional reactions, caregiving efforts, emotional exhaustion, and relational changes. While both groups experienced shock, guilt was more prominent in friendships and burden in romantic relationships. Accumulated exhaustion led to boundary-setting and distancing in friendships, and relationship termination with post-breakup guilt in romantic relationships. This study demonstrates that coping with a peer¡¯s suicidal crisis is a process shaped within relational contexts and highlights the need for sustainable suicide prevention interventions that take into account the influence of relational characteristics.






